home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1996-02-15 | 38.1 KB | 1,001 lines |
- @Q01
-
- ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐
- │ TO INCORPORATE OR NOT TO INCORPORATE: │
- │ THE PERENNIAL QUESTION │
- └───────────────────────────────────────────┘
-
- Please enter the name of your business (or your proposed
- business):
-
- @TX
- 01\Q02
-
- @Q02
-
- QUESTION: Is this a business that you have already started
- (or acquired)?
-
- @YN
- 01\Q03
- 02\Q10
-
- @Q03
-
- QUESTION: If you were to sell your business (or the stock
- of your incorporated business) today for its fair
- value, how much of a taxable gain or a loss would
- you have on the sale? (Make your best guess.)
-
- . 1 - A gain of over $1 million
- . 2 - A gain of $500,000 to $1 million
- . 3 - A gain of $100,000 to $500,000
- . 4 - A gain of $50,000 to $100,000
- . 5 - A gain of about $0 to $50,000
- . 6 - Breakeven, more or less
- . 7 - A loss of less than $50,000
- . 8 - A loss of $50,000 to $150,000
- . 9 - A loss in excess of $150,000
-
- @MC\09
- 01\Q04
- 02\Q04
- 03\Q04
- 04\Q04
- 05\Q04
- 06\Q04
- 07\Q04
- 08\Q04
- 09\Q04
-
- @Q04
-
- QUESTION: Is the business in question already incorporated?
-
- @YN
- 01\Q05
- 02\Q10
-
- @Q05
-
-
- QUESTION: Is the corporation an "S corporation"?
-
- @YN
- 01\Q06
- 02\Q22
-
- @Q22
-
- NET OPERATING LOSS OR TAX CREDIT CARRYOVERS: A C corporation
- that incurs net operating losses or has more tax credits than
- it can use in the current tax year can generally carry the
- losses or unused tax credits back to any of its 3 preceding
- tax years, to obtain refunds of taxes paid in those years.
- However, for a new corporation, or one that has no profitable
- prior years to carry losses or credits back to, there is no
- other choice but to carry the net operating losses (NOL's) or
- credits over to future years, in the hope that it will even-
- tually have taxable income against which the NOL or credit
- carryovers can be offset, reducing taxes in those future
- years. (Most NOL's or unused tax credits can be carried for-
- ward for up to 15 tax years after the year incurred.)
-
- QUESTION: Does your C corporation have substantial unused
- net operating loss or tax credit carryovers at
- present?
-
- @YN
- 01\Q06
- 02\Q06
-
- @Q06
-
- TAX LOSSES: Start up losses incurred by a regular ("C") cor-
- poration cannot be passed through to shareholders, but must
- be carried forward until (if ever) they can be used to off-
- set future taxable income of the corporation....And a more-
- than-50% change in stock ownership of the corporation can
- severely reduce the corporation's right to use a large part
- of any such tax loss carryovers.
-
- An S corporation election can be very useful in the early sta-
- ges of a business if it is losing money, due to the fact that
- the losses an S corporation incurs can be "passed through" to
- its shareholders and, in many cases, deducted on their indiv-
- idual tax returns. An S corporation can also pass through cer-
- tain tax credits, such as the targeted jobs credit and various
- other business credits, which might not be utilized currently
- in a C corporation that has little or no net taxable income.
-
- QUESTION: Is your corporation generating tax losses (Or do
- you expect it to?) in amounts you consider substantial?
- @YN
- 01\Q21
- 02\Q07
-
- @Q21
-
- The usability of your corporation's tax losses, even if it is
- an S corporation, depends upon whether those losses (and/or
- tax credits) can be passed through and utilized by the stock-
- holders. Thus, such losses may not flow through to your indi-
- vidual tax return if, for instance, they are "passive activi-
- ty" losses; you or the S corporation are not considered "at-
- risk" with respect to the losses; or you lack sufficient "tax
- basis" in your S corporation stock to utilize any further
- losses. Or, even if the losses or credits flow through to
- your individual return, you may not be able to use them cur-
- rently, due to insufficient taxable income of your own in the
- current year (or preceding 3 years) against which the losses
- can be applied, or else credits may not be usable by you due
- to such factors as the alternative minimum tax (AMT).
-
- QUESTION: To the best of your knowledge (only your tax
- adviser can tell you for sure about this one),
- do you think you could utilize your corpora-
- tion's tax losses if it is an S corporation?
- @YN
- 01\Q12
- 02\Q12
-
- @Q07
-
- QUESTION: How much annual PRE-TAX profit do you expect the
- corporation to earn each year in the near future
- (assuming you limit owner salaries to no more
- than $100,000 a year per owner, as a maximum) ?
-
- . 1 - None: We expect to have losses, or very
- minimal net profits, under $10,000 (as
- defined above)
- . 2 - Between $10,000 and $100,000 profit (as
- defined above)
- . 3 - Between $100,000 and $335,000 profit (as
- defined above)
- . 4 - Over $335,000 pre-tax profit (as defined
- above)
-
- @MC\04
- 01\Q12
- 02\Q12
- 03\Q12
- 04\Q12
-
- @Q10
-
- TAX LOSSES: Start-up or other losses or tax credits earned
- by an unincorporated business (a sole proprietorship or part-
- nership) can generally be passed through to the owner or ow-
- ners, to be claimed on their individual income tax returns.
- (Unless the deductions or credits are suspended due to at-
- risk or passive activity loss rules, or on account of insuf-
- ficient tax basis.) Such losses or credits cannot be used
- if the legal form of the business is a C corporation, but
- must instead be carried over to another year in which the
- corporation has taxable income.
-
- QUESTION: Will your business generate tax losses or tax
- credits in the next tax year (or two), in
- amounts that you consider substantial?
-
- @YN
- 01\Q12
- 02\Q11
-
- @Q11
-
- QUESTION: How much pre-tax profit (per owner, if more
- than one owner) do you expect the business to
- earn, on average, for the next few years
- (assuming the business is not incorporated)?
-
- . 1 - None: We expect to have losses, or not
- over $50,000 profit (as defined above)
- . 2 - Between $50,000 and $100,000 profit (as
- defined above)
- . 3 - Between $100,000 and $335,000 profit (as
- defined above)
- . 4 - Over $335,000 pre-tax profit (as defined
- above)
-
- @MC\04
- 01\Q12
- 02\Q12
- 03\Q12
- 04\Q12
-
- @Q12
-
- Medical insurance, medical reimbursement plan expenses, and
- other "fringe benefits" such as disability insurance and
- group-term life insurance are generally not deductible expen-
- ses for owners of unincorporated business or shareholders
- (owning 2% of the stock or more) of S corporations. By con-
- trast, a C corporation that pays for such benefits for its
- employees, including owner-employees, is generally able to
- deduct such expenses, with the value of such coverage gener-
- ally NOT being taxable to the employees (except for the
- value of group-term life insurance coverage in excess of
- $50,000 for a given employee).
-
- QUESTION: Do you (or does your business) plan to purchase
- medical coverage, disability insurance or group-
- term life insurance for you or the other owners
- of the business?
-
- @YN
- 01\Q20
- 02\Q20
-
- @Q20
-
- DIVIDENDS-RECEIVED DEDUCTION. A C corporation may sometimes
- be used advantageously to hold dividend-paying stocks, since
- the federal tax law allows the corporation to avoid paying
- tax on 70% of the dividends it receives (80% if your company
- owns 20% or more of the stock of the company paying the divi-
- dends). This deduction is NOT allowed to an S corporation
- that gets dividends. Putting securities in your corporation
- is not always a wise idea, however, despite the 70% dividends-
- received deduction. Taking the stocks (or proceeds from their
- sale) back out of your corporation can result in taxable gains
- at the corporate level and dividend or taxable gain to you as
- a shareholder, to the extent of the value of whatever you take
- out of the corporation. Thus, it can be costly if the situa-
- tion changes and you take the stock back out of the corporation.
-
- QUESTION: If you have significant dividend income from stocks,
- and in light of the foregoing discussion, would you be
- likely to benefit from the dividends-received deduction
- if your business, as a C corporation, held stocks?
- @YN
- 01\Q13
- 02\Q13
-
- @Q13
-
- QUALIFIED PERSONAL SERVICE CORPORATIONS: Certain personal
- service businesses, if incorporated and engaged in rendering
- services in certain fields such as law, health, accounting,
- actuarial sciences, architecture, engineering, performing
- arts or consulting, are considered "QUALIFIED personal ser-
- vice corporations." ("QPSC") (If substantially all the stock
- is owned by employees or retired employees, etc.) Note that
- this definition is slightly different from the definition of
- "PERSONAL SERVICE CORPORATIONS" that applies to determine a
- corporation's permissible tax year & tax accounting method.
-
- A "QPSC" is taxed at a higher tax rate, generally (35% flat
- rate), than other C corporations (whose tax rates start at
- 15%). Obviously, this is a major disadvantage of being a QPSC.
-
- QUESTION: To the best of your knowledge (we realize this is
- a VERY technical definition), is your business one that
- will be considered a QPSC, if operated as a corporation?
-
- @YN
- 01\Q14
- 02\Q14
-
- @Q14
-
- PENSION PLANS: Both incorporated and unincorporated busines-
- ses may maintain qualified pension or profit-sharing plans,
- and the limits on contributions, benefits, etc., are now
- roughly the same for corporate, Sub S and Keogh (noncorpor-
- ate) retirement plans. There are a few differences that re-
- main, however, despite the "parity" rules that have generally
- put corporate and noncorporate plans on an equal footing in
- recent years.
-
-
- QUESTION: Does (or will) your business maintain qualified
- pension and/or profit-sharing plans for the
- owners and employees?
-
- @YN
- 01\Q15
- 01\Q16
-
- @Q15
-
- BORROWING FROM YOUR PENSION PLAN: The tax law allows a par-
- ticipant in a qualified pension or profit sharing plan, in
- some cases, to borrow against his or her account in the pen-
- sion or profit sharing plan, up to as much as $50,000 in
- some cases. But such borrowing is effectively prohibited
- in the case of certain types of qualified pension or profit
- sharing plans.
-
- QUESTION: How important, on a scale of 1 to 5 (with 5 being
- most important, 1 being least), is the ability to
- borrow from your company's pension plan to you
- (or to your co-owners in the business)?
-
- @MC\05
- 01\Q16
- 02\Q16
- 03\Q16
- 04\Q16
- 05\Q16
-
- @Q16
-
- LIMITED LIABILITY. One reason many businesses incorporate is
- to limit the liability of the owners, in the event the busi-
- ness fails. However, for most small businesses, lenders will
- usually require that the shareholders of a corporation person-
- ally guarantee repayment of any loans made to the corporation,
- since the lender is looking primarily to the owners, rather
- than the assets of the corporation itself, for security.
-
- Thus, for many types of liabilities typically incurred by a
- small or medium-sized business, incorporation will not serve
- to limit the owners' liability if the business bellies up--
- except against unsecured creditors, such as vendors who have
- extended credit to the business.
-
- QUESTION: How important to your business is the ability
- to limit liability by incorporating (on a scale
- from 1 to 5, with 5 being VERY important)?
-
- @MC\05
- 01\Q17
- 02\Q17
- 03\Q17
- 04\Q17
- 05\Q17
-
- @Q17
-
- PERSONAL HOLDING COMPANY STATUS: If your business derives 60%
- or more of its "adjusted ordinary gross income" from certain
- types of income, such as rents, royalties, interest or divid-
- ends, and operates as a C corporation, any net income that it
- fails to distribute as dividends to its shareholders may be
- subject to federal "personal holding company tax" of 39.6%,
- at the corporate level. This penalty tax does NOT apply to
- an unincorporated business or to an S corporation; nor to a C
- corporation unless over 50% of the stock is held (directly or
- indirectly) by five or fewer people. (A company with 50% or
- more of its "ordinary gross income" from a single passive cat-
- egory, such as rents, mineral/oil/gas royalties, copyright
- royalties, produced film rents, or active business computer
- software royalties, MAY be able to avoid personal holding com-
- pany status if various other technical requirements are met.)
-
- QUESTION: Based on the brief description above, do you be-
- lieve your business will be a "Personal Holding
- Company" if operated as a C corporation?
- @YN
- 01\Q18
- 02\Q18
-
- @Q18
-
- _______________________________________________________________________
-
- @BR\18
- 01\Q19
-
- @Q19
-
- @STOP
- @RD\01
-
- RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on your responses to the foregoing
- questions, the "EXPERT" has come to a tentative conclusion
- as to which legal form of business appears most advisable
- in your particular situation. (See below.)
-
- CAUTION: The following recommendation has been arrived at
- by weighing and assigning points to various known factors
- regarding your business, in an algorithm that attempts to
- quantify the unquantifiable. Since there are always numer-
- ous pros and cons in evaluating the optimum choice of legal
- entity, the process used by the program is a lot like com-
- paring 3 oranges with 2 apples and concluding which is
- better.
-
- Accordingly, you should not regard the following recommenda-
- tion as a definitive judgment, since it involves some very
- subjective choices and conclusions by the author of the pro-
- gram, and is also based on far less than complete informa-
- tion about your situation. However, it does represent an
- serious attempt to model the thought processes the author,
- an attorney and CPA, would go through in advising a client
- as to choice of legal entity, based on the key facts just
- elicited from you. Just remember that, in making "fuzzy"
- decisions of this type, no computer program is an adequate
- substitute for the considered judgment of a competent, ex-
- perienced, and intuitive professional adviser with a full
- grasp of the facts and circumstances relating to you and
- your business.
-
- RECOMMENDATION AS TO FORM OF BUSINESS:
-
- |VAR|
-
- @RD\02
-
- RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on your responses to the foregoing
- question and answer session, the program is unable to ident-
- ify any clear "Best" choice of legal entity for your busi-
- ness. While various weightings have been given to each of
- the three basic entity choices (unincorporated entity, C
- corporation and S corporation), and points assigned to each
- alternative, based on the largely subjective rating system
- devised for this program, there does not appear to be any
- clearly preferable entity choice in this case.
-
- However, for your consideration, we have provided the scores
- developed in our internal system of analysis. These numbers
- have no real meaning, and essentially represent an attempt
- to quantify our "hunches" about the optimum legal entity for
- your situation, based on the limited data we have on your
- business.
-
- (Note that there is |VAR| difference in the scores we
- developed, for the first- and second-best choices. Since
- there is a considerable lack of precision in our "fuzzy
- logic" methodology on which these scores are based, this
- one is definitely too close to call.)
-
- @RD\03
-
- More useful, in our opinion, will be your consideration of
- the various pros and cons of incorporation vs. not, C cor-
- poration vs. S corporation, etc., which are listed below,
- all of which are derived from our analysis of what you have
- told us about your particular company.
-
- @RD\04
- . Operating in unincorporated form is, to begin with, of-
- ten much simpler and less costly administratively than
- operating your business as an incorporated entity.
- @RD\05
- And, as you have probably already learned from experi-
- ence, operating as an S corporation is even more compli-
- cated than as a regular C corporation, due to the com-
- plexity of the tax laws governing S corporations and the
- need for expert accounting and tax help to maintain the
- S corporation properly.
-
- @RD\06
- . Since your business expects to incur substantial operat-
- ing losses for awhile, being unincorporated would give
- you a better chance to derive some current tax benefit
- from those losses, providing you (or your co-owners, if
- any) can personally utilize the losses or tax credits
- generated. As a C corporation, by contrast, any such
- losses (or tax credits) as are generated could not be
- utilized currently (by either the corporation or you),
- |VAR|.
- (An S corporation, of course, could generally pass
- through any such operating losses to the owner(s), much
- the same as an unincorporated business.)
-
- @RD\07
- . From the responses you have given, it appears that it
- could be advisable to consider liquidating your corpora-
- tion, and recognizing a substantial tax loss on the li-
- quidation of your stock. Of course, if the loss is
- treated as a capital loss, you will only be able to de-
- duct $3,000 a year against your other income (unless you
- have capital gains the loss could offset). However, if
- your stock is eligible for "Section 1244 Stock" treat-
- ment, you may be able to treat the first $50,000 (or
- $100,000 on a joint return) of any loss on liquidation
- as an ORDINARY loss, which ought to be fully deductible
- in many cases. (There are a number of technical quali-
- fications in order to actually take such a loss, so con-
- sult a good tax lawyer or other competent tax adviser
- before concluding that you ought to liquidate your cor-
- poration, |VAR|.)
-
- @RD\08
- . You may want to liquidate your C corporation and operate
- as a sole proprietorship or partnership, or else elect S
- corporation status, in order to avoid high marginal cor-
- poration tax rates, which it appears in this case would be
- 39% (Federal), compared to marginal tax rates of ranging
- from about 31% to 39.6% if the business income were taxed
- at individual income tax rates, rather than C corporation
- rates. (However, there might be significant taxes to rec-
- ognize by the corporation upon any such liquidation, so
- electing S corporation status may be a better tactic.)
-
- @RD\09
- . It appears that at your company's level of profitability,
- a C corporation would probably be in a marginal income
- tax bracket of 39%. Thus an unincorporated business
- could possibly save some current federal income taxes,
- since individuals are taxed at federal income tax rates
- ranging from about 31% to 39.6%, as a general rule, at
- this same general income level.
-
- @RD\10
- . An unincorporated business will also save on Federal and
- state unemployment taxes on the earnings of the owners,
- since as owner-employees of a corporation, unemployment
- taxes would apply to wages or salary paid to the owner--
- but no such tax applies to the business earnings of a
- partner in a partnership or to a sole proprietor, who
- take a "draw" rather than salary or wages.
-
- . Unincorporated businesses do not have to be concerned with
- the possible double taxation of profits, unlike C corpora-
- tions (and, to a lesser extent, some S corporations).
-
- . An unincorporated business does not have to be concerned
- with either of the corporate penalty taxes, the personal
- holding company tax or the accumulated earnings tax, both
- of which apply only to C corporations.
-
- @RD\11
- . One other important benefit of starting out a business in
- unincorporated form is increased flexibility, from a tax
- standpoint. An unincorporated business can always incor-
- porate, but if you have already incorporated, liquidating
- in order to dis-incorporate can give rise to potentially
- huge capital gains taxes.
-
- @RD\12
- . Operating as a C corporation can be a real drawback in the
- case of your business, since you have indicated that your
- particular type of business is one that may be considered
- a Personal Holding Company. If so, and you are unable to
- zero out its income each year through salary payments or
- other operating expenses, you could be in the grim situa-
- tion of incurring double taxation on the corporation's
- net income. That is, not only would the corporation pay
- tax on its pre-tax income, but there would also be a se-
- cond tax on the remaining after-tax net income: either
- the 39.6% personal holding company tax, or, if all of the
- after-tax net income is paid out as dividends to the
- shareholders, individual income tax on the dividend pay-
- ments. This is not a problem if you operate the business
- in unincorporated form, or as an S corporation.
-
- @RD\13
- . Perhaps the most common and pervasive reason for a busi-
- ness to be incorporated is to achieve some degree of lim-
- ited liability. While such limited liability may not be
- absolute, particularly where creditors of the corpora-
- tion, lessors, etc., require the owners of the corpora-
- tion to personally guarantee repayment of corporate loans
- or leases, limited liability can still be a big advantage.
- @RD\14
- You have indicated that limited liability is VERY import-
- ant for |VAR|.
-
- @RD\15
- You indicated, however, that limited liability is NOT very
- important for |VAR|.
-
- @RD\16
- . Liquidating a corporation where there is a taxable gain
- on the transaction can be costly, particularly since it
- is often difficult to determine the fair value of a going
- concern (and since the IRS may argue that your taxable
- gain is much larger than you thought it was). Since you
- have indicated that you would probably have a substantial
- gain on liquidation of your existing corporation, the re-
- sulting tax liability you would personally incur is one
- good reason NOT to dis-incorporate by liquidating. Also,
- the corporation itself may incur additional tax upon any
- liquidation if it holds assets (including intangibles
- like "goodwill" that may not even be on its books) that
- have a value in excess of their tax basis.
-
- @RD\17
- . Because you have indicated your business is incurring
- operating losses, an S corporation would have advantages
- for you, as compared to a C corporation, since some or
- all of such corporate tax losses may be "passed through"
- to you as a shareholders, and thus should be currently
- utilizable by you in reducing your personal income tax
- liability. By contrast, start up losses incurred by a
- corporation cannot be used to offset income, unless car-
- ried over and used to reduce the corporation's taxable
- income in future years, when (or if) the corporation ev-
- entually becomes profitable. A deduction today is usu-
- ally worth more than a possible deduction some years in
- the future.
-
- @RD\18
- . For a business operating at an annual profit level of
- less than $100,000 or so (after owners' salaries), a C
- corporation may provide an income-splitting opportunity
- which can reduce, or at least defer, overall taxes.
- This can be done by leaving some profit (under $75,000
- a year, preferably) in the C corporation, shifting such
- income out of the owners' 28% or 31% tax brackets into
- the lower corporate tax brackets of 15% on the first
- $50,000 and 25% on the next $25,000 of corporate taxable
- income. This won't work if the corporation is a "qual-
- ified personal service corporation," which is subject
- to tax at a flat rate of 35% on all its net income. But
- you have indicated that the business may have profits
- of less than $100,000 a year, and that it will not be
- considered a "qualified personal service corporation"
- if operated as a C corporation, so you may be able to
- benefit to some extent from income-splitting by using
- |VAR| as a second taxpayer.
-
- @RD\19
- . Unlike a sole proprietorship or partnership, a corpora-
- tion has continuous existence and does not terminate
- upon the death of a stockholder or a change of ownership
- of some or all of its stock. Creditors, suppliers, and
- customers often prefer to deal with an incorporated busi-
- ness because of this greater continuity of the enterprise
- that is provided by the corporate form. Of course, like
- other forms of business organization, a corporation can
- be terminated by mutual consent of the owners, or even
- by one shareholder in some instances.
-
- . A corporation also provides advantages, particularly when
- compared to a partnership, of centralized control, since
- state corporate laws typically provide rules for election
- of a board of directors by the shareholders and selection
- of a president and other corporate officers to manage the
- everyday affairs of the business, by the board of direc-
- tors. Lines of authority are usually much clearer and
- more formal than in the usual partnership arrangement.
-
- @RD\20
- . The ability of participants to individually borrow
- against their accounts under a pension plan can be a sig-
- nificant benefit of having a pension plan for your em-
- ployees. However, borrowing is allowed only in the case
- of a "qualified" pension or profit sharing plan of a C
- corporation. Such borrowing is subject to a "prohibited
- transactions" penalty tax in the case of a plan main-
- tained by unincorporated business (Keogh plan) or by an
- S corporation. You have indicated that the ability of
- the participants to borrow from your company's pension
- or profit sharing plan is|VAR| important to you.
-
- @RD\21
- . The corporate "dividends-received deduction," under
- which a C corporation (but not an S corporation) can
- exclude 70% or more of dividends it receives from cor-
- porate stock investments from taxable income, is a val-
- uable potential tax benefit of operating a business in
- the form of a C corporation. You have indicated that
- this may be an important tax benefit in your case.
-
- @RD\22
- . The federal tax laws permit corporate employers (except
- for S corporations) to provide a number of different
- fringe benefits to employees who are owners (shareholder-
- employees), on a tax-favored basis. Generally, the emp-
- loyer is allowed to deduct the insurance premiums or oth-
- er payments it makes on behalf of the employee, while
- the employee is not taxed on the value of the benefit
- provided. Thus, being incorporated (as a C corporation)
- has important advantages for your business if you wish
- to obtain group-term life insurance, health/accident
- coverage (insured or otherwise), or disability insurance
- coverage for the principals in your business, since you
- will not be able to obtain this favorable tax treatment
- as an S corporation, or as a partner or sole proprietor
- in an unincorporated business, with regard to these
- kinds of fringe benefit plans.
-
- @RD\23
- . Because your C corporation has substantial unused net op-
- erating loss (NOL) or tax credit carryovers, liquidating
- the corporation would have a major disadvantage: Those
- NOL or credit carryovers, which might otherwise be used
- to offset future taxable income of the corporation some-
- day, would vanish forever if your corporation were li-
- quidated and turned into an unincorporated business.
- Also, if S corporation status were elected, those carry-
- overs would then become useless until after the corpora-
- tion elected to revert back to C corporation status once
- again--they cannot be used to shelter any income earned
- while operating as an S corporation.
-
- @RD\24
- . You have indicated that your business is a professional
- service firm. As a C corporation, you will incur a ma-
- jor disadvantage, since all of the taxable income of a
- "qualified professional service corporation" is subject
- to a flat federal tax rate of 35%. This is higher than
- the individual tax bracket (except for high-income indi-
- viduals) and a serious disincentive to operating a pro-
- fessional firm as a C corporation.
-
- @RD\25
- _______________________________________________________________________
-
- S CORPORATIONS VS. C CORPORATIONS:
-
- Advantages of C Corporations over S Corporations--
-
- . C corporations are generally less complex entities to
- maintain, from a tax standpoint, than S corporations.
-
- . C corporations (except for certain "personal service cor-
- porations"), can offset losses from passive activities
- against active business income. S corporations cannot.
-
- . C corporations are entitled to the dividends received de-
- duction on any dividend income they receive; S corpora-
- tions are not.
-
- @RD\26
- . C corporations are separate taxpaying entities, so at
- certain levels of corporate net income, generally under
- $100,000, a C corporation may be used advantageously to
- split income, paying tax at rates lower than if the in-
- come were all taxed to individual shareholders, as in
- the case of an S corporation.
-
- @RD\27
- . Shareholder-employees of C corporations have advantages
- over S corporation shareholders (who own over 2% of the
- stock) with regard to excluding from income the cost of
- certain fringe benefits for owners, such as health care
- coverage, group-term life insurance, and long-term dis-
- ability insurance.
-
- @RD\28
- . Owner-employees may borrow from their qualified pension
- or profit sharing plans, if the plans are sponsored by
- a C corporation.
-
- @RD\29
-
- Advantages of S Corporations over C Corporations--
-
- . S corporations do not usually have to be concerned about
- possible double taxation of corporate profits, since
- their profits are generally taxed only once, to their
- shareholders.
-
- . Also, S corporations are not subject to corporate penal-
- ty taxes, such as the personal holding company tax or
- the accumulated earnings tax, which apply only to C
- corporations.
-
- @RD\30
- . If a new corporation is incurring losses, shareholders
- of an S corporation may be able to utilize the tax los-
- ses currently, while a C corporation can only carry the
- losses over till it eventually (if ever) becomes profi-
- table.
-
- @RD\31
- . Conversely, at relatively high levels of taxable income
- (generally between $100,000 and $335,000), S corporation
- shareholders may pay tax at a lower rate than a C corpor-
- ation (which is in a 39% marginal bracket at that income
- level) would pay on the same income.
-
- @RD\32
- . It appears that at your company's level of profitability,
- a C corporation would probably be in a marginal income
- tax bracket of 34%. (The 35% rate doesn't begin until $10
- million for corporations.) This is a lower rate than for
- an unincorporated business, since individuals are now
- taxed at federal income tax rates of at least 39.6%, as a
- general rule, at taxable income levels of over $250,000.
-
- @HELP
-
- @H\01
-
- Type in the name of your business,
- then press "Enter" key.
-
- @H\02
-
- Enter "Y" ("Yes") if you are already in
- business. If you are still planning to
- start or acquire the business, enter "N"
- ("No").
-
- @H\03
-
- Note that if you were to sell your stock
- in an S corporation, your tax basis for
- the stock is likely to be something more
- or less than your original cost, since
- income or contributions to capital of
- the corporation will have increased your
- tax basis, and tax losses and distribu-
- tions will have decreased your basis. So
- you need to use your ADJUSTED tax basis
- for your stock, not its original basis,
- in "guesstimating" your gain or loss on
- stock of an S corporation.
-
- @H\04
-
- Answer this question "Y" for "Yes" or
- "N" for "No."
-
- @H\05
-
- An "S corporation" is a corporation that
- has made an election (on Form 2553) for
- Federal income tax purposes to have most
- or all of its income & all of its losses
- taxed directly to its shareholders, in-
- stead of paying tax at the corporate
- level. A corporation that is NOT an S
- corporation is called a "C corporation."
-
- Corporations may also elect treatment as
- S corporations for state income tax pur-
- poses, in all but a few states.
-
- @H\06
-
- Answer "Y" ("YES") if you anticipate tax
- losses by your corporation, EVEN IF you
- anticipate that such losses might not be
- currently utilizable for some reason, by
- a C corporation, or if passed through to
- you by an S corporation.
-
- @H\07
- In computing your firm's estimated pre-
- tax profits for the purposes of this
- question, make the hypothetical assump-
- tion that each owner will take out no
- more than $100,000 a year in salary.
-
- Thus, for example, if you actually in-
- tend to take out $150,000 salary next
- year, add back $50,000 to pre-tax cor-
- porate income to do this calculation.
-
- @H\10
-
- Answer "N" ("NO") if you anticipate sub-
- stantial losses, or credits but for some
- reason, such as passive activity loss or
- at-risk loss restrictions, or insuffici-
- ent "tax basis," you do not expect to be
- able to immediately use those losses (or
- credits) on your individual income tax
- return.
-
- @H\11
-
- In computing pre-tax profit for purposes
- of answering this question, do not sub-
- tract draws or salary taken out of the
- business by you (or by other owners).
-
- @H\12
-
- Medical, disability, and group-term life
- insurance fringe benefits for the owners
- of a C corporation are treated very fav-
- orably for tax purposes. Not only is
- the amount paid for such insurance most-
- ly nontaxable to the employee-owner, but
- the benefits (insurance payments, etc.)
- are generally tax-free to the recipient,
- as well, except for disability benefits
- (which are generally taxable to the em-
- ployee, if the premiums were paid by the
- corporation).
-
- @H\13
-
- To be a QPSC, a corporation must be en-
- gaged almost exclusively in rendering
- services in one of the fields listed,
- and must be "substantially" (95%) owned
- by its employees, retired employees, or
- the estate of either (or by an heir, up
- to 2 years after death).
-
- The definition of a Qualified Personal
- Service Corporation is very complex and
- difficult to explain to anyone but tax
- lawyers. At this point, you may wish to
- exit to the menu of consulting subjects
- and go thru the Q & A routine on QPSCs.
-
- @H\14
-
- Note that a Keogh plan, a Section 401K
- plan, or an ESOP is a qualified plan.
-
- However, an "SEP" ("Simplified Employee
- Pension plan"), in which the employer
- contributes to IRA accounts set up on
- behalf of employees, is NOT considered
- a qualified plan for purposes of this
- analysis.
-
- @H\15
-
- In general, a participant in a pension
- or profit sharing plan may borrow up to
- $50,000 from the plan, but not over the
- larger of the following two amounts:
-
- . One-half of his or her vested
- benefits under the plan; or
-
- . $10,000.
-
- An owner-employee is prohibited from
- borrowing at all from an S corporation
- plan, or from a Keogh plan (of an unin-
- corporated business).
-
- @H\16
-
- Some types of corporations, such as typ-
- ical professional corporations in many
- states, provide little, if any, limita-
- tion on liability since the laws in many
- states provide that such corporations do
- NOT limit liability for claims such as
- professional malpractice damages, which
- are a major area of exposure for most
- types of professional corporations.
-
- @H\17
-
- "Adjusted Ordinary Gross Income" is the
- ordinary GROSS income (excluding capital
- gains) of a corporation, before any de-
- ductions, except for certain adjustments
- applicable to rental income and mineral
- and oil and gas royalty income (such as
- depreciation or depletion, property tax,
- interest and rents paid), and other mis-
- cellaneous adjustments that apply only
- to certain kinds of special taxpayers
- and types of income.
-
- @H\20
-
- Note that if your C corporation borrows
- money to finance or carry its purchases
- of dividend-paying stocks, in order to
- benefit from the dividends received de-
- duction, its interest deduction will be
- reduced. It cannot deduct interest in-
- curred to buy tax-free investments.
-
- @H\21
-
- Note that losses passed through by an S
- corporation to its shareholders are not
- necessarily deductible by a shareholder
- if the shareholder has used up all the
- "tax basis" of his stock (plus loans he
- has made to the corporation). Nor can
- such losses be used if they are consid-
- ered "passive activity" losses, and the
- shareholder does not have income from
- other passive activities that he can
- offset the passive losses against.
-
- @H\22
-
- Note that your corporation may be very
- profitable, with significant taxable
- income and tax liability, and yet may
- still have significant tax credits that
- it is carrying forward, due to the com-
- plex interplay between tax credits and
- the alternative minimum tax ("AMT") un-
- der the tax law. Liquidation of the
- corporation would cause any such carry-
- overs, as well as any NOL carryovers,
- to be lost forever.
-
- @END